Reply by Brandolini et al.

An et al. Reply.

Yildirim et al. Reply.

A Reply to the Comment by S. Skanthakumar, J. W. Lynn, and I. W. Sumarlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2842 (1995).

Tharyan Et Al Reply

may be because cases of gul dependence are usually not brought for consultation to the psychiatrists. It has been our experience that there is usually an increase in the symptomatic abuse of this product in psychotic disorders and episodes of depressive illness. This report is an effort to bring to the notice of researchers in the field of psychiatry and related fields, the endemic abuse of thi...

Park et al. Reply

Reply to Comment by Young et al.

Had our study been, as Young et al. imply, a data trawling exercise using hundreds of variables to look for a 'thread', then doubts about its validity might be justified. However, their account of our work bears little relationship to the methods, results or conclusions we report. For example, Young et al. claim that we used 396 tests to address our primary hypothesis. In fact, we used two. You...